Lithuania vs Turkey: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Lithuania
1.43 square meters
in 2023
Turkey
1.4 square meters
in 2023
Lithuania rank
132nd
Turkey rank
133rd
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Lithuania
- Turkey
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 1.43 square meters against 1.4 square meters in Turkey, a difference of 0.03 square meters.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Turkey ahead.
Lithuania ranks 132nd and Turkey ranks 133rd of 178 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Turkey in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.89 square meters | 4.77 square meters | 1.88 square meters | Turkey |
| 2010s | 3.61 square meters | 4.82 square meters | 1.21 square meters | Turkey |
| 2020s | 2.39 square meters | 1.73 square meters | 0.6563 square meters | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Lithuania or Turkey?
- Lithuania, at 1.43 square meters against 1.4 square meters in Turkey as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Lithuania and Turkey?
- 0.03 square meters, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Turkey?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Turkey rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Lithuania ranks 132nd and Turkey ranks 133rd of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.