Mauritius vs New Caledonia: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Mauritius
0 square meters
in 2018
New Caledonia
0 square meters
in 2023
Mauritius rank
156th
New Caledonia rank
156th
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Mauritius
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0 square meters against 0 square meters in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 square meters.
Across all 14 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 156th and New Caledonia ranks 156th of 178 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 square meters | 0 square meters | 0 square meters | — |
| 2010s | 0 square meters | 0 square meters | 0 square meters | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Mauritius or New Caledonia?
- Mauritius, at 0 square meters against 0 square meters in New Caledonia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Mauritius and New Caledonia?
- 0 square meters, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and New Caledonia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2018.
- How do Mauritius and New Caledonia rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Mauritius ranks 156th and New Caledonia ranks 156th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.