Morocco vs Tunisia: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Morocco
0.768 square meters
in 2023
Tunisia
0.7978 square meters
in 2023
Morocco rank
146th
Tunisia rank
144th
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Morocco
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 0.7978 square meters against 0.768 square meters in Morocco, a difference of 0.0298 square meters.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tunisia ahead.
Morocco ranks 146th and Tunisia ranks 144th of 178 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Morocco averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Morocco | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.71 square meters | 3.43 square meters | 1.72 square meters | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 1.74 square meters | 2.44 square meters | 0.6995 square meters | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 1.08 square meters | 0.9093 square meters | 0.1734 square meters | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Morocco or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 0.7978 square meters against 0.768 square meters in Morocco as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Morocco and Tunisia?
- 0.0298 square meters, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Tunisia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Morocco and Tunisia rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Morocco ranks 146th and Tunisia ranks 144th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.