Morocco vs Yemen: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Morocco
0.768 square meters
in 2023
Yemen
0.6577 square meters
in 2023
Morocco rank
146th
Yemen rank
148th
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Morocco
- Yemen
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 0.768 square meters against 0.6577 square meters in Yemen, a difference of 0.1103 square meters.
That makes Morocco's figure about 1.2 times Yemen's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Morocco ahead.
Morocco ranks 146th and Yemen ranks 148th of 178 countries.
Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Morocco | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.71 square meters | 1.48 square meters | 0.2254 square meters | Morocco |
| 2010s | 1.74 square meters | 0.9316 square meters | 0.8123 square meters | Morocco |
| 2020s | 1.08 square meters | 0.4927 square meters | 0.5899 square meters | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Morocco or Yemen?
- Morocco, at 0.768 square meters against 0.6577 square meters in Yemen as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Morocco and Yemen?
- 0.1103 square meters, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Yemen?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Morocco and Yemen rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Morocco ranks 146th and Yemen ranks 148th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.