Nepal vs Ukraine: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Nepal
1.21 square meters
in 2023
Ukraine
1.25 square meters
in 2023
Nepal rank
137th
Ukraine rank
136th
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Nepal
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 1.25 square meters against 1.21 square meters in Nepal, a difference of 0.04 square meters.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Ukraine ahead.
Nepal ranks 137th and Ukraine ranks 136th of 178 countries.
Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.8391 square meters | 0.9248 square meters | 0.0858 square meters | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 0.7848 square meters | 1.49 square meters | 0.7094 square meters | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 0.9479 square meters | 1.05 square meters | 0.1009 square meters | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Nepal or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 1.25 square meters against 1.21 square meters in Nepal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Nepal and Ukraine?
- 0.04 square meters, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Ukraine?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Nepal and Ukraine rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Nepal ranks 137th and Ukraine ranks 136th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.