Niger vs Uzbekistan: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Niger
1.05 square meters
in 2023
Uzbekistan
0.8455 square meters
in 2023
Niger rank
140th
Uzbekistan rank
143rd
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Niger
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Niger currently reports 1.05 square meters against 0.8455 square meters in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.2045 square meters.
That makes Niger's figure about 1.2 times Uzbekistan's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Niger has been ahead every year.
Niger ranks 140th and Uzbekistan ranks 143rd of 178 countries.
Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Niger | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.6618 square meters | 0.1468 square meters | 0.515 square meters | Niger |
| 2010s | 0.9268 square meters | 0.2347 square meters | 0.6921 square meters | Niger |
| 2020s | 0.8852 square meters | 0.5649 square meters | 0.3203 square meters | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Niger or Uzbekistan?
- Niger, at 1.05 square meters against 0.8455 square meters in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Niger and Uzbekistan?
- 0.2045 square meters, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Uzbekistan?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Niger and Uzbekistan rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Niger ranks 140th and Uzbekistan ranks 143rd of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.