Russia vs Togo: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Russia
1.75 square meters
in 2023
Togo
1.85 square meters
in 2023
Russia rank
125th
Togo rank
122nd
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Russia
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 1.85 square meters against 1.75 square meters in Russia, a difference of 0.1 square meters.
That makes Togo's figure about 1.1 times Russia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Russia ahead.
Russia ranks 125th and Togo ranks 122nd of 178 countries.
Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russia | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.85 square meters | 2.13 square meters | 0.7235 square meters | Russia |
| 2010s | 3.48 square meters | 1.62 square meters | 1.86 square meters | Russia |
| 2020s | 2.09 square meters | 1.4 square meters | 0.687 square meters | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Russia or Togo?
- Togo, at 1.85 square meters against 1.75 square meters in Russia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Russia and Togo?
- 0.1 square meters, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russia and Togo?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Russia and Togo rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Russia ranks 125th and Togo ranks 122nd of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.