Slovenia vs Tanzania: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Slovenia
2.59 square meters
in 2023
Tanzania
2.67 square meters
in 2023
Slovenia rank
108th
Tanzania rank
106th
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Slovenia
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 2.67 square meters against 2.59 square meters in Slovenia, a difference of 0.08 square meters.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Slovenia ahead.
Slovenia ranks 108th and Tanzania ranks 106th of 178 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Slovenia averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.79 square meters | 5.76 square meters | 0.0219 square meters | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 4.72 square meters | 7.18 square meters | 2.46 square meters | Tanzania |
| 2020s | 3.35 square meters | 2.78 square meters | 0.5707 square meters | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Slovenia or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 2.67 square meters against 2.59 square meters in Slovenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Slovenia and Tanzania?
- 0.08 square meters, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Tanzania?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Slovenia and Tanzania rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Slovenia ranks 108th and Tanzania ranks 106th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.