Slovenia vs Uganda: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Slovenia
2.59 square meters
in 2023
Uganda
2.45 square meters
in 2023
Slovenia rank
108th
Uganda rank
109th
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Slovenia
- Uganda
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 2.59 square meters against 2.45 square meters in Uganda, a difference of 0.14 square meters.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Slovenia ahead.
Slovenia ranks 108th and Uganda ranks 109th of 178 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.79 square meters | 2.73 square meters | 3.06 square meters | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 4.72 square meters | 3.87 square meters | 0.8433 square meters | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 3.35 square meters | 2.76 square meters | 0.5881 square meters | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Slovenia or Uganda?
- Slovenia, at 2.59 square meters against 2.45 square meters in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Slovenia and Uganda?
- 0.14 square meters, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Uganda?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Slovenia and Uganda rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Slovenia ranks 108th and Uganda ranks 109th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.