Solomon Islands vs East Timor: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Solomon Islands
0 square meters
in 2023
East Timor
0 square meters
in 2023
Solomon Islands rank
156th
East Timor rank
156th
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Solomon Islands
- East Timor
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 0 square meters against 0 square meters in East Timor, a difference of 0 square meters.
Across all 19 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.
Solomon Islands ranks 156th and East Timor ranks 156th of 178 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Solomon Islands | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 square meters | 0 square meters | 0 square meters | — |
| 2010s | 0 square meters | 0 square meters | 0 square meters | — |
| 2020s | 0 square meters | 0 square meters | 0 square meters | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Solomon Islands or East Timor?
- Solomon Islands, at 0 square meters against 0 square meters in East Timor as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Solomon Islands and East Timor?
- 0 square meters, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and East Timor?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Solomon Islands and East Timor rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Solomon Islands ranks 156th and East Timor ranks 156th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.