Sudan vs Vanuatu: Consumption of Fixed Capital (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing)

Sudan
3,588 million SLC
in 2017
Vanuatu
3,650 million SLC
in 2023
Sudan rank
89th
Vanuatu rank
88th

Consumption of Fixed Capital (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) over time

  • Sudan
  • Vanuatu
02.0k4.0k6.0k199520092023

How they compare

Vanuatu currently reports 3,650 million SLC against 3,588 million SLC in Sudan, a difference of 62 million SLC.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.

Sudan ranks 89th and Vanuatu ranks 88th of 181 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher consumption of fixed capital (agriculture, forestry and fishing), Sudan or Vanuatu?
Vanuatu, at 3,650 million SLC against 3,588 million SLC in Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in consumption of fixed capital (agriculture, forestry and fishing) between Sudan and Vanuatu?
62 million SLC, with Vanuatu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Vanuatu?
7 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2017.
How do Sudan and Vanuatu rank globally for consumption of fixed capital (agriculture, forestry and fishing)?
Sudan ranks 89th and Vanuatu ranks 88th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Consumption of Fixed Capital (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sudan vs Vanuatu: Consumption of Fixed Capital (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/consumption-of-fixed-capital-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-2/sudan/vanuatu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/consumption-of-fixed-capital-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-2/sudan/vanuatu/">Sudan vs Vanuatu: Consumption of Fixed Capital (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Consumption of Fixed Capital (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
194 places, 5,511 data points, 1995–2023
Last refreshed

As part of the FAO Agriculture Capital Stock (ACS) database, the Statistics Division of FAO publishes country-by-country data on physical investment in agriculture, forestry and fishing as measured by the System of National Accounts (SNA) concept of Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF). Additional variables included in the ACS are Net and Gross Capital Stock, Consumption of Fixed Capital, the Agriculture Investment ratio, and the Gross Fixed Capital Formation Agriculture Orientation Index. The FAO Agriculture Capital Stock Database is an analytical database: whenever available, the database integrates official National Accounts data harvested from the UNSD National Accounts Main Aggregates Database (UNSD AMA) and the OECD Annual National Accounts Database (OECD ANA). The database is further supplemented by OECD Structural Analysis database (OECD STAN) and, in a few cases, data from country’s statistics websites. If the full set of official data is not available for any specific country, imputation methods are applied to obtain estimates over the complete time series. Many data points in ACS are estimated and are flagged as such; they do not represent official submissions by Member Countries. With a view of producing internationally comparable net capital stock estimates, the Perpetual Inventory Method (PIM) with a constant geometric depreciation rate is employed to impute missing data. The Perpetual Inventory Method is a well-established economic model to calculate Net Capital Stocks (NCS) and Consumption of Fixed Capital (CFC) from time series of Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF). Specifically, annual measures of the NCS are obtained from cumulating historical series on physical investment flows and deducting the part of assets that are depreciated (the Consumption of Fixed Capital that occurs in every period). In order to implement the PIM, long time series on aggregate GFCF in agriculture, forestry and fishing is required.An attempt is made to rely as much as possible on National Accounts data published by the OECD and UNSD. When country data are partially or fully missing, econometric techniques to impute missing observations are employed. Depending on the pattern of data missingness for the countries, different imputation methods are applied (from among the ARIMAX, PANEL regression, and OLS approaches) for the data series from 1995 to 2022. The values of Agriculture Capital Stock related indicators for 2023, including Agriculture Investment Ratio, Agriculture Orientation Index, Net Capital Stock, Gross Fixed Capital Formation and Consumption of Fixed Capital, are estimated using the Holt-Winters (HW) method (Cipra et al., 1995). The HW method is an exponential smoothing method for forecasting the annual values of economic variables. In this context, the HW method relies on existing (historical) values of the Agriculture Capital Stock. The predicted value is an extrapolation of the historical values to the specified target date, which extends the timeline without considering seasonality in the annual series.All data series in the database are provided both in national currencies and in US dollars as well as in current prices and constant prices with base year 2015.