Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Consumption of Fixed Capital (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing)
Consumption of Fixed Capital (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) over time
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
How they compare
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 9,244 million USD against 4,820 million USD in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 4,424 million USD.
That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 1.9 times United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 21st and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 18th of 29 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 2 and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,615 million USD | 2,719 million USD | 1,104 million USD | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
| 2000s | 2,730 million USD | 3,644 million USD | 913.96 million USD | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
| 2010s | 5,576 million USD | 4,575 million USD | 1,001 million USD | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 2020s | 7,668 million USD | 4,955 million USD | 2,713 million USD | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption of fixed capital (agriculture, forestry and fishing), Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 9,244 million USD against 4,820 million USD in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption of fixed capital (agriculture, forestry and fishing) between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 4,424 million USD, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
- How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for consumption of fixed capital (agriculture, forestry and fishing)?
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 21st and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 18th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Consumption of Fixed Capital (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
As part of the FAO Agriculture Capital Stock (ACS) database, the Statistics Division of FAO publishes country-by-country data on physical investment in agriculture, forestry and fishing as measured by the System of National Accounts (SNA) concept of Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF). Additional variables included in the ACS are Net and Gross Capital Stock, Consumption of Fixed Capital, the Agriculture Investment ratio, and the Gross Fixed Capital Formation Agriculture Orientation Index. The FAO Agriculture Capital Stock Database is an analytical database: whenever available, the database integrates official National Accounts data harvested from the UNSD National Accounts Main Aggregates Database (UNSD AMA) and the OECD Annual National Accounts Database (OECD ANA). The database is further supplemented by OECD Structural Analysis database (OECD STAN) and, in a few cases, data from country’s statistics websites. If the full set of official data is not available for any specific country, imputation methods are applied to obtain estimates over the complete time series. Many data points in ACS are estimated and are flagged as such; they do not represent official submissions by Member Countries. With a view of producing internationally comparable net capital stock estimates, the Perpetual Inventory Method (PIM) with a constant geometric depreciation rate is employed to impute missing data. The Perpetual Inventory Method is a well-established economic model to calculate Net Capital Stocks (NCS) and Consumption of Fixed Capital (CFC) from time series of Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF). Specifically, annual measures of the NCS are obtained from cumulating historical series on physical investment flows and deducting the part of assets that are depreciated (the Consumption of Fixed Capital that occurs in every period). In order to implement the PIM, long time series on aggregate GFCF in agriculture, forestry and fishing is required.An attempt is made to rely as much as possible on National Accounts data published by the OECD and UNSD. When country data are partially or fully missing, econometric techniques to impute missing observations are employed. Depending on the pattern of data missingness for the countries, different imputation methods are applied (from among the ARIMAX, PANEL regression, and OLS approaches) for the data series from 1995 to 2022. The values of Agriculture Capital Stock related indicators for 2023, including Agriculture Investment Ratio, Agriculture Orientation Index, Net Capital Stock, Gross Fixed Capital Formation and Consumption of Fixed Capital, are estimated using the Holt-Winters (HW) method (Cipra et al., 1995). The HW method is an exponential smoothing method for forecasting the annual values of economic variables. In this context, the HW method relies on existing (historical) values of the Agriculture Capital Stock. The predicted value is an extrapolation of the historical values to the specified target date, which extends the timeline without considering seasonality in the annual series.All data series in the database are provided both in national currencies and in US dollars as well as in current prices and constant prices with base year 2015.