Australia vs Sri Lanka: Consumption of ozone depleting substances
Australia
7.86
in 2021
Sri Lanka
8.58
in 2021
Australia rank
60th
Sri Lanka rank
58th
Consumption of ozone depleting substances over time
- Australia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 8.58 against 7.86 in Australia, a difference of 0.72.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 60th and Sri Lanka ranks 58th of 166 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 16,931 | 123.05 | 16,808 | Australia |
| 1990s | 3,761 | 345.1 | 3,416 | Australia |
| 2000s | 215.64 | 150.12 | 65.52 | Australia |
| 2010s | 13.69 | 12.69 | 0.992 | Australia |
| 2020s | 11.95 | 8.57 | 3.38 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption of ozone depleting substances, Australia or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 8.58 against 7.86 in Australia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in consumption of ozone depleting substances between Australia and Sri Lanka?
- 0.72, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Sri Lanka?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2021.
- How do Australia and Sri Lanka rank globally for consumption of ozone depleting substances?
- Australia ranks 60th and Sri Lanka ranks 58th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Consumption of ozone depleting substances. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.