Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs South Sudan: Consumption of ozone-depleting substances

Bolivia, Plurinational State of
1.09 ODP tonnes
in 2021
South Sudan
1.04 ODP tonnes
in 2021
Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank
94th
South Sudan rank
95th

Consumption of ozone-depleting substances over time

  • Bolivia, Plurinational State of
  • South Sudan
020406080100198620032021

How they compare

Bolivia, Plurinational State of currently reports 1.09 ODP tonnes against 1.04 ODP tonnes in South Sudan, a difference of 0.05 ODP tonnes.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1986 it was South Sudan ahead.

Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 94th and South Sudan ranks 95th of 168 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Bolivia, Plurinational State of averaged higher in 4 and South Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia, Plurinational State of South Sudan Difference Ahead
1980s 28.7 ODP tonnes 67.95 ODP tonnes 39.25 ODP tonnes South Sudan
1990s 65.7 ODP tonnes 18.88 ODP tonnes 46.82 ODP tonnes Bolivia, Plurinational State of
2000s 4.4 ODP tonnes 4.1 ODP tonnes 0.3 ODP tonnes Bolivia, Plurinational State of
2010s 3.98 ODP tonnes 2.63 ODP tonnes 1.35 ODP tonnes Bolivia, Plurinational State of
2020s 1.54 ODP tonnes 1.04 ODP tonnes 0.505 ODP tonnes Bolivia, Plurinational State of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher consumption of ozone-depleting substances, Bolivia, Plurinational State of or South Sudan?
Bolivia, Plurinational State of, at 1.09 ODP tonnes against 1.04 ODP tonnes in South Sudan as of 2021.
What is the difference in consumption of ozone-depleting substances between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and South Sudan?
0.05 ODP tonnes, with Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and South Sudan?
19 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2021.
How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and South Sudan rank globally for consumption of ozone-depleting substances?
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 94th and South Sudan ranks 95th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UN Environment Programme (2023) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption of ozone-depleting substances. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs South Sudan: Consumption of ozone-depleting substances. Statizoid, drawing on UN Environment Programme (2023) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/consumption-of-ozone-depleting-substances/bolivia/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/consumption-of-ozone-depleting-substances/bolivia/south-sudan/">Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs South Sudan: Consumption of ozone-depleting substances</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Consumption of ozone-depleting substances
Unit
ODP tonnes
Source
UN Environment Programme (2023) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
168 places, 5,376 data points, 1986–2022
Last refreshed

Consumption of various controlled substances. These include Bromochloromethane (BCM), Carbon Tetrachloride (CTC), Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), Hydrobromofluorocarbons (HBFCs), Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), Methyl Bromide (MB), Methyl Chloroform (TCA) and Other Fully Halogenated CFCs. We assign zero to missing values for a given (year, country, chemical) triple. This is due to technical reasons, so that we are able to plot this variable using our Grapher stacked are charts.