El Salvador vs Serbia: Consumption of ozone-depleting substances
Consumption of ozone-depleting substances over time
- El Salvador
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 4.57 ODP tonnes against 3.97 ODP tonnes in El Salvador, a difference of 0.6 ODP tonnes.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Serbia ahead.
El Salvador ranks 72nd and Serbia ranks 69th of 168 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 361.95 ODP tonnes | 2,878 ODP tonnes | 2,516 ODP tonnes | Serbia |
| 1990s | 341.74 ODP tonnes | 881.72 ODP tonnes | 539.98 ODP tonnes | Serbia |
| 2000s | 83.56 ODP tonnes | 227.8 ODP tonnes | 144.24 ODP tonnes | Serbia |
| 2010s | 7.34 ODP tonnes | 8.03 ODP tonnes | 0.697 ODP tonnes | Serbia |
| 2020s | 3.36 ODP tonnes | 4.92 ODP tonnes | 1.56 ODP tonnes | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption of ozone-depleting substances, El Salvador or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 4.57 ODP tonnes against 3.97 ODP tonnes in El Salvador as of 2021.
- What is the difference in consumption of ozone-depleting substances between El Salvador and Serbia?
- 0.6 ODP tonnes, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Serbia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2021.
- How do El Salvador and Serbia rank globally for consumption of ozone-depleting substances?
- El Salvador ranks 72nd and Serbia ranks 69th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Environment Programme (2023) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption of ozone-depleting substances. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Consumption of various controlled substances. These include Bromochloromethane (BCM), Carbon Tetrachloride (CTC), Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), Hydrobromofluorocarbons (HBFCs), Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), Methyl Bromide (MB), Methyl Chloroform (TCA) and Other Fully Halogenated CFCs. We assign zero to missing values for a given (year, country, chemical) triple. This is due to technical reasons, so that we are able to plot this variable using our Grapher stacked are charts.