Kiribati vs San Marino: Consumption of ozone-depleting substances

Kiribati
0 ODP tonnes
in 2021
San Marino
0 ODP tonnes
in 2021
Kiribati rank
140th
San Marino rank
140th

Consumption of ozone-depleting substances over time

  • Kiribati
  • San Marino
0102030198620032021

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 0 ODP tonnes against 0 ODP tonnes in San Marino, a difference of 0 ODP tonnes.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1986 it was San Marino ahead.

Kiribati ranks 140th and San Marino ranks 140th of 168 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and San Marino in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati San Marino Difference Ahead
1980s 0.4 ODP tonnes 23.7 ODP tonnes 23.3 ODP tonnes San Marino
1990s 0 ODP tonnes 0.5 ODP tonnes 0.5 ODP tonnes San Marino
2000s 0 ODP tonnes 0 ODP tonnes 0 ODP tonnes
2010s 0.027 ODP tonnes 0 ODP tonnes 0.027 ODP tonnes Kiribati
2020s 0 ODP tonnes 0 ODP tonnes 0 ODP tonnes

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher consumption of ozone-depleting substances, Kiribati or San Marino?
Kiribati, at 0 ODP tonnes against 0 ODP tonnes in San Marino as of 2021.
What is the difference in consumption of ozone-depleting substances between Kiribati and San Marino?
0 ODP tonnes, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and San Marino?
16 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2021.
How do Kiribati and San Marino rank globally for consumption of ozone-depleting substances?
Kiribati ranks 140th and San Marino ranks 140th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UN Environment Programme (2023) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption of ozone-depleting substances. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs San Marino: Consumption of ozone-depleting substances. Statizoid, drawing on UN Environment Programme (2023) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/consumption-of-ozone-depleting-substances/kiribati/san-marino/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/consumption-of-ozone-depleting-substances/kiribati/san-marino/">Kiribati vs San Marino: Consumption of ozone-depleting substances</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Consumption of ozone-depleting substances
Unit
ODP tonnes
Source
UN Environment Programme (2023) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
168 places, 5,376 data points, 1986–2022
Last refreshed

Consumption of various controlled substances. These include Bromochloromethane (BCM), Carbon Tetrachloride (CTC), Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), Hydrobromofluorocarbons (HBFCs), Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), Methyl Bromide (MB), Methyl Chloroform (TCA) and Other Fully Halogenated CFCs. We assign zero to missing values for a given (year, country, chemical) triple. This is due to technical reasons, so that we are able to plot this variable using our Grapher stacked are charts.