Liechtenstein vs San Marino: Consumption of ozone-depleting substances
Consumption of ozone-depleting substances over time
- Liechtenstein
- San Marino
How they compare
Liechtenstein currently reports 0 ODP tonnes against 0 ODP tonnes in San Marino, a difference of 0 ODP tonnes.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Liechtenstein ahead.
Liechtenstein ranks 140th and San Marino ranks 140th of 168 countries.
Liechtenstein has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liechtenstein | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 30.6 ODP tonnes | 23.7 ODP tonnes | 6.9 ODP tonnes | Liechtenstein |
| 1990s | 25.1 ODP tonnes | 0.5 ODP tonnes | 24.6 ODP tonnes | Liechtenstein |
| 2000s | 0 ODP tonnes | 0 ODP tonnes | 0 ODP tonnes | — |
| 2010s | 0 ODP tonnes | 0 ODP tonnes | 0 ODP tonnes | — |
| 2020s | 0 ODP tonnes | 0 ODP tonnes | 0 ODP tonnes | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption of ozone-depleting substances, Liechtenstein or San Marino?
- Liechtenstein, at 0 ODP tonnes against 0 ODP tonnes in San Marino as of 2021.
- What is the difference in consumption of ozone-depleting substances between Liechtenstein and San Marino?
- 0 ODP tonnes, with Liechtenstein ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liechtenstein and San Marino?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2021.
- How do Liechtenstein and San Marino rank globally for consumption of ozone-depleting substances?
- Liechtenstein ranks 140th and San Marino ranks 140th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Environment Programme (2023) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption of ozone-depleting substances. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Consumption of various controlled substances. These include Bromochloromethane (BCM), Carbon Tetrachloride (CTC), Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), Hydrobromofluorocarbons (HBFCs), Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), Methyl Bromide (MB), Methyl Chloroform (TCA) and Other Fully Halogenated CFCs. We assign zero to missing values for a given (year, country, chemical) triple. This is due to technical reasons, so that we are able to plot this variable using our Grapher stacked are charts.