Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Philippines: Countries with users/communities participating in planning programs
Democratic Republic of the Congo
2
in 2025
Philippines
3
in 2025
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
3rd
Philippines rank
1st
Countries with users/communities participating in planning programs over time
- Democratic Republic of the Congo
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 3 against 2 in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 1.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.5 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 3rd and Philippines ranks 1st of 7 regions.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of the Congo | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.67 | 2 | 0.3333 | Philippines |
| 2020s | 1 | 3 | 2 | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher countries with users/communities participating in planning programs, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 3 against 2 in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in countries with users/communities participating in planning programs between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Philippines?
- 1, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Philippines?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2025.
- How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Philippines rank globally for countries with users/communities participating in planning programs?
- Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 3rd and Philippines ranks 1st of 7 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Countries with users/communities participating in planning programs in rural drinking-water supply, by level of participation (3 = High; 2 = Moderate; 1 = Low; 0 = NA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.