Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Timor-Leste: Countries with users/communities participating in planning programs
Lao People's Democratic Republic
2
in 2025
Timor-Leste
2
in 2025
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
3rd
Timor-Leste rank
3rd
Countries with users/communities participating in planning programs over time
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 2 against 2 in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 3rd and Timor-Leste ranks 3rd of 7 regions.
Lao People's Democratic Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lao People's Democratic Republic | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.33 | 2.33 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 1.5 | 0.5 | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher countries with users/communities participating in planning programs, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Timor-Leste?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 2 against 2 in Timor-Leste as of 2025.
- What is the difference in countries with users/communities participating in planning programs between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Timor-Leste?
- 0, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Timor-Leste?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2025.
- How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Timor-Leste rank globally for countries with users/communities participating in planning programs?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 3rd and Timor-Leste ranks 3rd of 7 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Countries with users/communities participating in planning programs in rural drinking-water supply, by level of participation (3 = High; 2 = Moderate; 1 = Low; 0 = NA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.