Lao People's Democratic Republic vs East Timor: Countries with users/communities participating in planning programs
Lao People's Democratic Republic
2
in 2025
East Timor
2
in 2025
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
25th
East Timor rank
25th
Countries with users/communities participating in planning programs over time
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
- East Timor
How they compare
Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 2 against 2 in East Timor, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 25th and East Timor ranks 25th of 55 countries.
Lao People's Democratic Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lao People's Democratic Republic | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.33 | 2.33 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 1.5 | 0.5 | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher countries with users/communities participating in planning programs, Lao People's Democratic Republic or East Timor?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 2 against 2 in East Timor as of 2025.
- What is the difference in countries with users/communities participating in planning programs between Lao People's Democratic Republic and East Timor?
- 0, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and East Timor?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2025.
- How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and East Timor rank globally for countries with users/communities participating in planning programs?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 25th and East Timor ranks 25th of 55 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Countries with users/communities participating in planning programs in rural drinking-water supply, by level of participation (3 = High; 2 = Moderate; 1 = Low; 0 = NA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.