Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Mexico: Country area — Area, annual growth rate

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Mexico
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha rank
28th
Mexico rank
28th

Country area — Area, annual growth rate over time

  • Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
  • Mexico
-0.2-0.15-0.1-0.05-0196219932024

How they compare

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Mexico, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Mexico ahead.

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 28th and Mexico ranks 28th of 250 countries.

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year
1970s 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year
1980s 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year
1990s 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year
2000s 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year
2010s 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year
2020s -0.0308 % change on previous year -0.0733 % change on previous year 0.0425 % change on previous year Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher country area — area, annual growth rate, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha or Mexico?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Mexico as of 2024.
What is the difference in country area — area, annual growth rate between Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Mexico?
0 % change on previous year, with Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Mexico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Mexico rank globally for country area — area, annual growth rate?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 28th and Mexico ranks 28th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Country area — Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Mexico: Country area — Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/country-area-area-annual-growth-rate/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/country-area-area-annual-growth-rate/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/mexico/">Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Mexico: Country area — Area, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Country area — Area, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
284 places, 16,214 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Country area — Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.