Angola vs Jordan: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Angola
9.79
in 2024
Jordan
11.58
in 2024
Angola rank
155th
Jordan rank
153rd
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Angola
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 11.58 against 9.79 in Angola, a difference of 1.79.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.2 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 155th and Jordan ranks 153rd of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Jordan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.79 | 6.54 | 3.25 | Angola |
| 2010s | 9.79 | 10.95 | 1.16 | Jordan |
| 2020s | 9.79 | 11.58 | 1.79 | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Angola or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 11.58 against 9.79 in Angola as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Angola and Jordan?
- 1.79, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Jordan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Angola and Jordan rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Angola ranks 155th and Jordan ranks 153rd of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.