Argentina vs Iceland: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Argentina
37.99
in 2024
Iceland
40.68
in 2024
Argentina rank
107th
Iceland rank
104th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Argentina
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 40.68 against 37.99 in Argentina, a difference of 2.69.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Iceland ahead.
Argentina ranks 107th and Iceland ranks 104th of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.44 | 31.46 | 0.021 | Iceland |
| 2010s | 36.4 | 32.49 | 3.91 | Argentina |
| 2020s | 37.99 | 39.04 | 1.05 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Argentina or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 40.68 against 37.99 in Argentina as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Argentina and Iceland?
- 2.69, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Iceland?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Argentina and Iceland rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Argentina ranks 107th and Iceland ranks 104th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.