Armenia vs Grenada: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Armenia
62.05
in 2024
Grenada
62.8
in 2024
Armenia rank
68th
Grenada rank
67th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Armenia
- Grenada
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 62.8 against 62.05 in Armenia, a difference of 0.75.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 68th and Grenada ranks 67th of 179 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.93 | 62.8 | 22.87 | Grenada |
| 2010s | 61.31 | 62.8 | 1.49 | Grenada |
| 2020s | 62.05 | 62.8 | 0.75 | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Armenia or Grenada?
- Grenada, at 62.8 against 62.05 in Armenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Armenia and Grenada?
- 0.75, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Grenada?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and Grenada rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Armenia ranks 68th and Grenada ranks 67th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.