Armenia vs Grenada: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Armenia
62.0%
in 2025
Grenada
62.8%
in 2025
Armenia rank
70th
Grenada rank
69th
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- Armenia
- Grenada
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 62.8% against 62.0% in Armenia, a difference of 0.8%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 70th and Grenada ranks 69th of 184 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.5% | 62.8% | 14.3% | Grenada |
| 2010s | 61.8% | 62.8% | 1.0% | Grenada |
| 2020s | 62.0% | 62.8% | 0.8% | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Armenia or Grenada?
- Grenada, at 62.8% against 62.0% in Armenia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Armenia and Grenada?
- 0.8%, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Grenada?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Armenia and Grenada rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- Armenia ranks 70th and Grenada ranks 69th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC β processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).