Armenia vs Malawi: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Armenia
62.05
in 2024
Malawi
61.52
in 2024
Armenia rank
68th
Malawi rank
70th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Armenia
- Malawi
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 62.05 against 61.52 in Malawi, a difference of 0.53.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malawi ahead.
Armenia ranks 68th and Malawi ranks 70th of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.93 | 61.52 | 21.59 | Malawi |
| 2010s | 61.31 | 61.52 | 0.214 | Malawi |
| 2020s | 62.05 | 61.52 | 0.53 | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Armenia or Malawi?
- Armenia, at 62.05 against 61.52 in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Armenia and Malawi?
- 0.53, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Malawi?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and Malawi rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Armenia ranks 68th and Malawi ranks 70th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.