Armenia vs Nepal: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Armenia
62.0%
in 2025
Nepal
62.0%
in 2025
Armenia rank
70th
Nepal rank
71st
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- Armenia
- Nepal
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 62.0% against 62.0% in Nepal, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nepal ahead.
Armenia ranks 70th and Nepal ranks 71st of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.5% | 57.0% | 8.5% | Nepal |
| 2010s | 61.8% | 62.0% | 0.2% | Nepal |
| 2020s | 62.0% | 62.0% | 0.1% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Armenia or Nepal?
- Armenia, at 62.0% against 62.0% in Nepal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Armenia and Nepal?
- 0.0%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Nepal?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Armenia and Nepal rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- Armenia ranks 70th and Nepal ranks 71st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC β processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).