Australia vs Japan: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Australia
67.41
in 2024
Japan
67.87
in 2024
Australia rank
56th
Japan rank
54th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Australia
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 67.87 against 67.41 in Australia, a difference of 0.46.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Japan ahead.
Australia ranks 56th and Japan ranks 54th of 179 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.69 | 48.32 | 9.63 | Japan |
| 2010s | 52.13 | 58.5 | 6.37 | Japan |
| 2020s | 66.3 | 66.83 | 0.534 | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Australia or Japan?
- Japan, at 67.87 against 67.41 in Australia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Australia and Japan?
- 0.46, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Japan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Japan rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Australia ranks 56th and Japan ranks 54th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.