Australia vs Norway: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Australia
67.41
in 2024
Norway
67
in 2024
Australia rank
56th
Norway rank
57th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Australia
- Norway
How they compare
Australia currently reports 67.41 against 67 in Norway, a difference of 0.41.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Norway ahead.
Australia ranks 56th and Norway ranks 57th of 179 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.69 | 46.73 | 8.04 | Norway |
| 2010s | 52.13 | 62 | 9.87 | Norway |
| 2020s | 66.3 | 67 | 0.7 | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Australia or Norway?
- Australia, at 67.41 against 67 in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Australia and Norway?
- 0.41, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Norway?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Norway rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Australia ranks 56th and Norway ranks 57th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.