Austria vs Tanzania: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Austria
65.6%
in 2025
Tanzania
66.5%
in 2025
Austria rank
60th
Tanzania rank
58th
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- Austria
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 66.5% against 65.6% in Austria, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Tanzania ahead.
Austria ranks 60th and Tanzania ranks 58th of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.3% | 55.2% | 3.1% | Austria |
| 2010s | 64.5% | 57.9% | 6.6% | Austria |
| 2020s | 65.5% | 66.5% | 1.0% | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Austria or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 66.5% against 65.6% in Austria as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Austria and Tanzania?
- 0.9%, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Tanzania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Austria and Tanzania rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- Austria ranks 60th and Tanzania ranks 58th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC β processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).