Austria vs Zambia: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Austria
65.57
in 2024
Zambia
65.29
in 2024
Austria rank
61st
Zambia rank
62nd
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Austria
- Zambia
How they compare
Austria currently reports 65.57 against 65.29 in Zambia, a difference of 0.28.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zambia ahead.
Austria ranks 61st and Zambia ranks 62nd of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.04 | 65.29 | 7.25 | Zambia |
| 2010s | 64.6 | 65.29 | 0.687 | Zambia |
| 2020s | 65.54 | 65.29 | 0.248 | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Austria or Zambia?
- Austria, at 65.57 against 65.29 in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Austria and Zambia?
- 0.28, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Zambia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Austria and Zambia rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Austria ranks 61st and Zambia ranks 62nd of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.