Belgium vs Eswatini: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Belgium
25.49
in 2024
Eswatini
22.66
in 2024
Belgium rank
137th
Eswatini rank
140th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Belgium
- Eswatini
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 25.49 against 22.66 in Eswatini, a difference of 2.83.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Eswatini ahead.
Belgium ranks 137th and Eswatini ranks 140th of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.21 | 20.88 | 15.67 | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 14.25 | 21.07 | 6.82 | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 25.04 | 22.66 | 2.38 | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Belgium or Eswatini?
- Belgium, at 25.49 against 22.66 in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Belgium and Eswatini?
- 2.83, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Eswatini?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Eswatini rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Belgium ranks 137th and Eswatini ranks 140th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.