Brazil vs Georgia: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Brazil
51.4
in 2024
Georgia
56.74
in 2024
Brazil rank
82nd
Georgia rank
79th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Brazil
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 56.74 against 51.4 in Brazil, a difference of 5.34.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 82nd and Georgia ranks 79th of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Georgia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.19 | 31.76 | 5.44 | Brazil |
| 2010s | 48.13 | 45.32 | 2.81 | Brazil |
| 2020s | 51.39 | 53.18 | 1.78 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Brazil or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 56.74 against 51.4 in Brazil as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Brazil and Georgia?
- 5.34, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Georgia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Georgia rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Brazil ranks 82nd and Georgia ranks 79th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.