Brazil vs East Timor: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Brazil
51.4
in 2024
East Timor
50.79
in 2024
Brazil rank
82nd
East Timor rank
84th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Brazil
- East Timor
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 51.4 against 50.79 in East Timor, a difference of 0.61.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 82nd and East Timor ranks 84th of 179 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.19 | 21.71 | 15.48 | Brazil |
| 2010s | 48.13 | 47.57 | 0.563 | Brazil |
| 2020s | 51.39 | 50.79 | 0.602 | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Brazil or East Timor?
- Brazil, at 51.4 against 50.79 in East Timor as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Brazil and East Timor?
- 0.61, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and East Timor?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and East Timor rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Brazil ranks 82nd and East Timor ranks 84th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.