Brazil vs East Timor: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Brazil
51.9%
in 2025
East Timor
50.8%
in 2025
Brazil rank
84th
East Timor rank
85th
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- Brazil
- East Timor
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 51.9% against 50.8% in East Timor, a difference of 1.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 84th and East Timor ranks 85th of 184 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.5% | 21.7% | 15.8% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 48.6% | 47.6% | 1.0% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 51.9% | 50.8% | 1.1% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Brazil or East Timor?
- Brazil, at 51.9% against 50.8% in East Timor as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Brazil and East Timor?
- 1.1%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and East Timor?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Brazil and East Timor rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- Brazil ranks 84th and East Timor ranks 85th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).