Cape Verde vs Serbia: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Cape Verde
54.8%
in 2025
Serbia
57.1%
in 2025
Cape Verde rank
81st
Serbia rank
76th
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- Cape Verde
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 57.1% against 54.8% in Cape Verde, a difference of 2.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Serbia ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 81st and Serbia ranks 76th of 184 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.4% | 27.5% | 10.8% | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 54.8% | 34.7% | 20.1% | Cape Verde |
| 2020s | 54.8% | 50.5% | 4.3% | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Cape Verde or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 57.1% against 54.8% in Cape Verde as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Cape Verde and Serbia?
- 2.3%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Serbia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Cape Verde and Serbia rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- Cape Verde ranks 81st and Serbia ranks 76th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).