Cambodia vs Finland: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Cambodia
93.8%
in 2025
Finland
97.0%
in 2025
Cambodia rank
15th
Finland rank
12th
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- Cambodia
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 97.0% against 93.8% in Cambodia, a difference of 3.2%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Cambodia ranks 15th and Finland ranks 12th of 184 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60.8% | 90.3% | 29.5% | Finland |
| 2010s | 73.7% | 96.9% | 23.2% | Finland |
| 2020s | 93.8% | 97.0% | 3.1% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Cambodia or Finland?
- Finland, at 97.0% against 93.8% in Cambodia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Cambodia and Finland?
- 3.2%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Finland?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Cambodia and Finland rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- Cambodia ranks 15th and Finland ranks 12th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).