Cambodia vs Poland: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Cambodia
93.82
in 2024
Poland
94.3
in 2024
Cambodia rank
15th
Poland rank
14th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Cambodia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 94.3 against 93.82 in Cambodia, a difference of 0.48.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Cambodia ranks 15th and Poland ranks 14th of 179 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60.8 | 79.59 | 18.79 | Poland |
| 2010s | 73.72 | 93.83 | 20.11 | Poland |
| 2020s | 93.82 | 94.3 | 0.48 | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Cambodia or Poland?
- Poland, at 94.3 against 93.82 in Cambodia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Cambodia and Poland?
- 0.48, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Poland?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Cambodia and Poland rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Cambodia ranks 15th and Poland ranks 14th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.