Canada vs Iceland: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Canada
41.37
in 2024
Iceland
40.68
in 2024
Canada rank
102nd
Iceland rank
104th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Canada
- Iceland
How they compare
Canada currently reports 41.37 against 40.68 in Iceland, a difference of 0.69.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Iceland ahead.
Canada ranks 102nd and Iceland ranks 104th of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 2 and Iceland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.27 | 31.46 | 2.19 | Iceland |
| 2010s | 37.32 | 32.49 | 4.83 | Canada |
| 2020s | 41.29 | 39.04 | 2.25 | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Canada or Iceland?
- Canada, at 41.37 against 40.68 in Iceland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Canada and Iceland?
- 0.69, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Iceland?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Canada and Iceland rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Canada ranks 102nd and Iceland ranks 104th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.