Chad vs North Macedonia: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Chad
50
in 2024
North Macedonia
47.28
in 2024
Chad rank
86th
North Macedonia rank
89th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Chad
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Chad currently reports 50 against 47.28 in North Macedonia, a difference of 2.72.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 86th and North Macedonia ranks 89th of 179 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 38.8 | 11.2 | Chad |
| 2010s | 50 | 42.22 | 7.78 | Chad |
| 2020s | 50 | 47.21 | 2.79 | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Chad or North Macedonia?
- Chad, at 50 against 47.28 in North Macedonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Chad and North Macedonia?
- 2.72, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and North Macedonia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Chad and North Macedonia rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Chad ranks 86th and North Macedonia ranks 89th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.