Chad vs Timor-Leste: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Chad
50
in 2024
Timor-Leste
50.79
in 2024
Chad rank
86th
Timor-Leste rank
84th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Chad
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 50.79 against 50 in Chad, a difference of 0.79.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 86th and Timor-Leste ranks 84th of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 2 and Timor-Leste in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 21.71 | 28.29 | Chad |
| 2010s | 50 | 47.57 | 2.43 | Chad |
| 2020s | 50 | 50.79 | 0.79 | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Chad or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at 50.79 against 50 in Chad as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Chad and Timor-Leste?
- 0.79, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Timor-Leste?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Chad and Timor-Leste rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Chad ranks 86th and Timor-Leste ranks 84th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.