Chad vs East Timor: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Chad
50.0%
in 2025
East Timor
50.8%
in 2025
Chad rank
87th
East Timor rank
85th
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- Chad
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 50.8% against 50.0% in Chad, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 87th and East Timor ranks 85th of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 2 and East Timor in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.0% | 21.7% | 28.3% | Chad |
| 2010s | 50.0% | 47.6% | 2.4% | Chad |
| 2020s | 50.0% | 50.8% | 0.8% | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Chad or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 50.8% against 50.0% in Chad as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Chad and East Timor?
- 0.8%, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and East Timor?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Chad and East Timor rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- Chad ranks 87th and East Timor ranks 85th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC β processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).