Chile vs Congo: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Chile
44.2%
in 2025
Congo
45.0%
in 2025
Chile rank
100th
Congo rank
98th
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- Chile
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 45.0% against 44.2% in Chile, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 100th and Congo ranks 98th of 184 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.0% | 0.0% | 34.0% | Chile |
| 2010s | 39.3% | 0.0% | 39.3% | Chile |
| 2020s | 42.9% | 30.0% | 12.9% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Chile or Congo?
- Congo, at 45.0% against 44.2% in Chile as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Chile and Congo?
- 0.8%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Congo?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Congo rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- Chile ranks 100th and Congo ranks 98th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).