Chile vs Kazakhstan: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Chile
46.85
in 2024
Kazakhstan
46.77
in 2024
Chile rank
91st
Kazakhstan rank
92nd
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Chile
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Chile currently reports 46.85 against 46.77 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.08.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 91st and Kazakhstan ranks 92nd of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.39 | 32.61 | 4.78 | Chile |
| 2010s | 42.29 | 41.87 | 0.427 | Chile |
| 2020s | 45.46 | 46.77 | 1.31 | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Chile or Kazakhstan?
- Chile, at 46.85 against 46.77 in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Chile and Kazakhstan?
- 0.08, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kazakhstan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Kazakhstan rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Chile ranks 91st and Kazakhstan ranks 92nd of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.