Chile vs Malaysia: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Chile
46.85
in 2024
Malaysia
48.26
in 2024
Chile rank
91st
Malaysia rank
88th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Chile
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 48.26 against 46.85 in Chile, a difference of 1.41.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 91st and Malaysia ranks 88th of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.39 | 31.77 | 5.62 | Chile |
| 2010s | 42.29 | 45.52 | 3.23 | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 45.46 | 48.26 | 2.8 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Chile or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 48.26 against 46.85 in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Chile and Malaysia?
- 1.41, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Malaysia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Malaysia rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Chile ranks 91st and Malaysia ranks 88th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.