Chile vs Mozambique: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Chile
44.2%
in 2025
Mozambique
42.4%
in 2025
Chile rank
100th
Mozambique rank
103rd
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- Chile
- Mozambique
How they compare
Chile currently reports 44.2% against 42.4% in Mozambique, a difference of 1.8%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 100th and Mozambique ranks 103rd of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Mozambique in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.0% | 27.8% | 6.2% | Chile |
| 2010s | 39.3% | 41.6% | 2.3% | Mozambique |
| 2020s | 42.9% | 42.4% | 0.5% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Chile or Mozambique?
- Chile, at 44.2% against 42.4% in Mozambique as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Chile and Mozambique?
- 1.8%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mozambique?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Mozambique rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- Chile ranks 100th and Mozambique ranks 103rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).