Chile vs North Macedonia: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Chile
46.85
in 2024
North Macedonia
47.28
in 2024
Chile rank
91st
North Macedonia rank
89th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Chile
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 47.28 against 46.85 in Chile, a difference of 0.43.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 91st and North Macedonia ranks 89th of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.39 | 38.8 | 1.41 | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 42.29 | 42.22 | 0.073 | Chile |
| 2020s | 45.46 | 47.21 | 1.75 | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Chile or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 47.28 against 46.85 in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Chile and North Macedonia?
- 0.43, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and North Macedonia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Chile and North Macedonia rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Chile ranks 91st and North Macedonia ranks 89th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.