Chile vs Philippines: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Chile
44.2%
in 2025
Philippines
43.3%
in 2025
Chile rank
100th
Philippines rank
102nd
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- Chile
- Philippines
How they compare
Chile currently reports 44.2% against 43.3% in Philippines, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 100th and Philippines ranks 102nd of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.0% | 17.9% | 16.1% | Chile |
| 2010s | 39.3% | 27.4% | 11.9% | Chile |
| 2020s | 42.9% | 43.3% | 0.4% | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Chile or Philippines?
- Chile, at 44.2% against 43.3% in Philippines as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Chile and Philippines?
- 0.9%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Philippines?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Philippines rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- Chile ranks 100th and Philippines ranks 102nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).