Congo vs Kazakhstan: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Congo
44.99
in 2024
Kazakhstan
46.77
in 2024
Congo rank
95th
Kazakhstan rank
92nd
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Congo
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 46.77 against 44.99 in Congo, a difference of 1.78.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 95th and Kazakhstan ranks 92nd of 179 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 32.61 | 32.61 | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 9 | 41.87 | 32.87 | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 44.99 | 46.77 | 1.78 | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Congo or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 46.77 against 44.99 in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Congo and Kazakhstan?
- 1.78, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Kazakhstan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Kazakhstan rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Congo ranks 95th and Kazakhstan ranks 92nd of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.