Congo vs Trinidad and Tobago: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas

Congo
45.0%
in 2025
Trinidad and Tobago
45.1%
in 2025
Congo rank
98th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
97th

Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time

  • Congo
  • Trinidad and Tobago
01020304050200020122025

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 45.1% against 45.0% in Congo, a difference of 0.1%.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 98th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 97th of 184 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0% 42.9% 42.9% Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 0.0% 45.1% 45.1% Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 30.0% 45.1% 15.1% Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Congo or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 45.1% against 45.0% in Congo as of 2025.
What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Congo and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.1%, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Trinidad and Tobago?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Congo and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
Congo ranks 98th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 97th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Trinidad and Tobago: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid, drawing on BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/coverage-by-protected-areas-of-important-sites-for-mountain-biodiversity/congo-rep/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/coverage-by-protected-areas-of-important-sites-for-mountain-biodiversity/congo-rep/trinidad-and-tobago/">Congo vs Trinidad and Tobago: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Unit
%
Source
BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
184 places, 4,784 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).