Cook Islands vs Mayotte: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Cook Islands
20.75
in 2024
Mayotte
53.42
in 2024
Cook Islands rank
4th
Mayotte rank
1st
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Cook Islands
- Mayotte
How they compare
Mayotte currently reports 53.42 against 20.75 in Cook Islands, a difference of 32.67.
That makes Mayotte's figure about 2.6 times Cook Islands's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cook Islands ahead.
Cook Islands ranks 4th and Mayotte ranks 1st of 4 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cook Islands averaged higher in 1 and Mayotte in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cook Islands | Mayotte | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.75 | 8.24 | 12.51 | Cook Islands |
| 2010s | 20.75 | 25.63 | 4.88 | Mayotte |
| 2020s | 20.75 | 47.86 | 27.11 | Mayotte |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Cook Islands or Mayotte?
- Mayotte, at 53.42 against 20.75 in Cook Islands as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Cook Islands and Mayotte?
- 32.67, with Mayotte ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cook Islands and Mayotte?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Cook Islands and Mayotte rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Cook Islands ranks 4th and Mayotte ranks 1st of 4 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.