Czechia vs Finland: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Czechia
97.7%
in 2025
Finland
97.0%
in 2025
Czechia rank
11th
Finland rank
12th
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- Czechia
- Finland
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 97.7% against 97.0% in Finland, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Finland ahead.
Czechia ranks 11th and Finland ranks 12th of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Finland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74.0% | 90.3% | 16.4% | Finland |
| 2010s | 96.6% | 96.9% | 0.3% | Finland |
| 2020s | 97.7% | 97.0% | 0.8% | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Czechia or Finland?
- Czechia, at 97.7% against 97.0% in Finland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Czechia and Finland?
- 0.7%, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Finland?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Czechia and Finland rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- Czechia ranks 11th and Finland ranks 12th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).