Dominican Republic vs Zimbabwe: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Dominican Republic
85.5%
in 2025
Zimbabwe
87.5%
in 2025
Dominican Republic rank
27th
Zimbabwe rank
24th
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- Dominican Republic
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 87.5% against 85.5% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 2.0%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 27th and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 184 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.0% | 85.9% | 33.9% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 85.5% | 87.5% | 2.0% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 85.5% | 87.5% | 2.0% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Dominican Republic or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 87.5% against 85.5% in Dominican Republic as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Dominican Republic and Zimbabwe?
- 2.0%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Dominican Republic and Zimbabwe rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- Dominican Republic ranks 27th and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).